If you’re trying to build a high-end personal brand right now, it probably feels like everything sounds the same — the same frameworks, the same promises, the same recycled takes dressed up as insight.

You can feel it diluting value in real time. Nothing feels special anymore. Competence is everywhere, trust is thin, and even genuinely good work struggles to stand out because the market is drowning in “close enough.”

Luxury brands have dealt with this problem for decades. When copies flood the market, they don’t compete harder — they go deeper, building standards that can’t be duplicated without losing their meaning.

This is for high-level service providers, consultants, and experts who don’t want to win by volume, visibility, or gimmicks — but by becoming the reference point others measure themselves against.

If you’ve ever felt the tension between playing it safe and saying what you actually believe, you’re not behind — you’re right at the edge of something more powerful.

Admit it… Everything feels a bit samey. Every framework sounds familiar. Every offer promises transformation using language you’ve seen twelve times this month. Every piece of “thought leadership” reads like it was assembled from the same six LinkedIn posts and remixed by AI.

The market is drowning in competence, and somehow that makes it all feel… boring AF.

And here’s the part that’s sitting in your subconscious, pulling the strings… you’re probably doing this in your business too.

Every time you borrow someone else’s ideas, it feels less risky than originating your own… you’re choosing safety over significance. Not intentionally. Not maliciously. But every time you ask “Is this safe to say?” instead of “Is this true?”, every time you soften your edge to avoid pushback.

We’ve normalised safety. Safe opinions. Safe positioning. Safe ideas that won’t cost us anything… not followers, not opportunities, not comfort. The result is a market full of people who sound like echoes of each other, wondering why nobody’s listening and paying attention.

This is what dupe culture looks like in personal branding.

Not cheap knockoffs of expensive things, but smart people performing borrowed thinking because original ideas feel too dangerous to defend publicly.

What dupe culture does to value… cos it’s not just Prada knock-offs on DHGate

Luxury used to mean “the thing you aspire to.”
Now it means “the thing you can buy as a cheaper version.”

At first glance, dupes look democratic.

Why pay more when you can get basically the same thing?

But psychologically, this flips the entire value system. When everything becomes interchangeable, status stops being earned and starts being negotiated on price. The brain no longer reads luxury as a signal of discernment, it reads it as a pricing inefficiency waiting to be solved.

We stop looking at quality as a signal and look at quantity as value.

The deeper damage is that dupe culture trains people to evaluate worth comparatively instead of intrinsically.

The question shifts from “Is this exceptional?” to “Is this close enough?” That mindset doesn’t just dilute brands. It erodes belief in the myth of the brand. And once the myth is gone, no amount of storytelling or pricing strategy can resurrect it. Dupe culture killed it.

The simplest way to see this is how quickly excitement collapses. Dupes spike attention but destroy loyalty because nothing about them invites commitment.

Who wants to save up for a three grand handbag when you can buy one today for a hundred quid? When luxury loses its sense of excitement – that feeling of ‘this is the standard’ – it stops being something people aspire to and becomes something they shop around.

And once that happens, the entire category starts racing toward sameness, even if nobody admits it.

Psst, the market is reflecting this with the loss of aspirational shoppers.

And it’s not just in the luxury market…
Introducing: The Personal Brand Dupe Problem

The personal brand version of dupe culture isn’t about copying frameworks or principles. It’s about not having an original stance and standard in the first place.

It shows up as opinions that sound like the HR department signed them off to post. Insights scraped from other people’s lived experience instead of your own because you’ve decided you don’t have anything “exciting” to talk about. Language so boring neutral it could belong to anyone. A POV filed down until it has no teeth.

Or worse, it’s the same take as everyone else who saw “that TikTok” and now has a reaction video.

Depth of experience and wisdomis what actually creates authority, not breadth of knowledge. There’s a difference between someone who’s read about a problem and someone who’s bled solving it… shows up in every sentence they write.

One sounds informed, polished, and performative. The other feels lived in.

But experience alone isn’t enough if you’re too scared to have a position about it.

Real points of view have edges. They exclude people, they challenge assumptions, they cost you something to hold publicly. That’s why they work.

When you’re willing to say “this, not that” without hedging, you stop sounding like a run of the mill, “I did a £9.99 Udemy course” service provider and start sounding like THE STANDARD.

The problem isn’t that you don’t know what you’re talking about, it’s about being brave enough to put genuine, unique thinking into the world.

Thinking that’s yours, that came from your specific history, that uses language nobody else would choose… feels wildly unsafe. So most people don’t do it. They perform competence using “borrowed” vocabulary and wonder why nobody remembers them five minutes after they’ve scrolled by.

Competence is everywhere. Personality is rare AF.
And in a market this flat, personality is the only thing worth paying attention to.

Replica Brands vs The Standard

Replica brands win attention by producing more, faster, louder, with fewer pauses to consider whether any of it matters.
And they all sound the same.

The Standard… they operate differently. They produce density. Depth creates friction, and friction is what makes people slow down long enough to feel significance. This is why luxury favours restraint… fewer collections, fewer words, fewer moves. Scarcity of output creates room for density of meaning.

There’s a time signal here too. Depth suggests investment. Something lived with, tested, refined. The brain reads this as consideration, and consideration triggers a different kind of trust. Not “this seems useful” but “this feels valuable = investible in.”


So how do you actually become The Standard instead of a replica?

It starts with five signals that only originals have… and a case study that cost billions to figure out.

Tom Dixon has lost billions to counterfeits. His Beat and Copper pendant lamps are so widely copied that a staggering 7 out of 9 “Tom Dixon” results on major marketplaces are fakes! They are using his name, his product titles, his marketing copy, sold for a fraction of the price. Heartbreaking.

His lawyers told him what every lawyer tells every designer: chase them down, jurisdiction by jurisdiction, spending hundreds of thousands to shut down manufacturers who’ll probably reappear under different names within weeks.

Dixon said hell no.

Instead, he treated dupes as a design problem, not a legal one.

  • He invested heavily in manufacturing processes so technically complex that cheap factories couldn’t replicate them without destroying their margins.
  • He built bespoke, client-specific models that removed the economic incentive for standardised copies.
  • He transparently explained why his pieces cost more (his materials, ethics, craftsmanship, R&D etc.) reframing price as proof of integrity, not a weakness.

And here’s the brilliant part…

He stopped trying to eliminate dupes and started designing a world where their existence proved his status.

Because the market doesn’t dupe what’s popular. It dupes what’s The Standard.

What do you think?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

No Comments Yet.